BlockBlueLight SAD Lamp Review: Bright, But Flicker-Free?

Derek Antosiek

Derek Antosiek / February 24, 2026

Our work is reader-supported; if you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

A rectangular LED lamp with multiple light bulbs emits bright light on a wooden table. Text reads: Block Blue Light Full-Spectrum SAD Lamp, with an arrow pointing to the lamp. Green leaves are blurred in the background.

I’ve been meaning to test this “full spectrum” SAD lamp from BlockBlueLight, and now that I have it, I am not disappointed!

In this article, we’ll review all the specs, test results, and my thoughts after using it, so let’s jump in!

The Overview

This SAD lamp offers outstanding performance and unique specs, combining SunLike full-spectrum visible light with healthy infrared output, making it a versatile SAD lamp and infrared light therapy panel.

While it excels in effectiveness and build quality, its high glare and flicker when dimmed may be uncomfortable for those sensitive to bright light. Despite the premium price, it’s a top choice for those seeking unmatched full-spectrum and infrared benefits.

A rectangular LED light therapy panel with multiple small lights is standing on a wooden table, with a blurred plant and gray wall in the background.

Pros:

  • Extremely bright and effective
  • The only SAD lamp I know of using full spectrum SunLike diodes
  • Very full in healthy red and infrared coverage

Cons:

  • Expensive, but not terribly so for the performance
  • High glare rating, not very comfortable to use visually for a long time

🏷️ 10% off through link ⤵

The Lamp

This is an all-metal lamp similar to the Mitolux vitamin D lamp I tested. The main difference is that this emits only visible and infrared light; there is no UV here!

This puppy is bright, and including infrared light is very interesting. I’ve never seen a SAD lamp with visible and infrared light, so this is pretty neat.

A rectangular LED therapy light panel with a grid of bright white and some red lights, sitting on a wooden surface. The control buttons and a digital display reading 28:03 are visible at the bottom.

The front controls allow you to toggle between infrared only and visible + infrared. There’s also a brightness button that you can use to set the brightness from 10-25-50-75-100%.

A close-up of a device with multiple circular LED lights and a control panel displaying 30:00 in red digits, along with various buttons and an indicator light. The device is placed on a wooden surface.

This lamp’s unusual feature is that it only operates on a timer. Pressing the clock button lets you set the timer for 1 to 30 minutes, and hitting the power button starts the lamp and the countdown.

When the timer runs out, the lamp turns off, and the timer resets to the last duration you selected, ready for the next session. However, if you stop the lamp early—say, with 2 minutes remaining—its timer will still be set to 2 minutes the next time you turn it on.

At that point, you’ll either need to use it for the remaining 2 minutes or manually adjust the timer back to your preferred duration. To avoid this hassle, it’s best to let the lamp complete its full time cycle each time.

While this quirk isn’t a dealbreaker, it can be inconvenient.

Testing the Lamp

The specs on this lamp claim “full spectrum” as well as various infrared wavelengths:

  • 730nm
  • 770nm
  • 810nm
  • 850nm
  • 890nm

They also claim to be flicker-free! Let’s see about that…

So, as usual, I placed this lamp one foot in front of our spectrometer for a full 30-minute run cycle to see what it put out!

A light-colored, rectangular electronic device faces a black camera mounted on a tripod, both positioned against a plain dark background with a gradient lighting effect.
Here’s the setup.

Spectral Output

Here’s what I got:

I was very surprised to see the familiar SunLike visible light spectrum here. These are very high-quality diodes, so you’ll get realistic visible light from this lamp.

Here’s a graph of the visible light portion of this spectrum:

A spectral power distribution graph shows relative power versus wavelength for a BlockBlueLight full spectrum plus infrared SAD lamp, with peaks in the blue and red regions and coverage from 380 to 800 nanometers.

We also see five infrared spikes, so they’re not lying about that, either!

I measured around 14,500 lux at one foot and a circadian light output of around 27,000. Compare this to the Carex Day-Light Sky, a popular SAD lamp that also puts out around 14,500 lux but with a much lower circadian light output of 17,900.

That’s because this lamp has much less blue/turquoise light present, illustrated by it’s spectral graph:

Spectral Power Distribution Graph showing light intensity across visible wavelengths from 380 to 780 nm with peaks in various color regions

Overall the BlockBlueLight SAD lamp is incredibly bright, effective, and realistic! And the added infrared is awesome!

Testing Flicker

Now, is this thing really flicker-free? I placed it in front of our professional flicker meter to see.

A camera on a tripod is positioned in a dark room facing a bright LED light panel that is illuminated, casting a glare and lens flare.

Sort of.

It’s completely flicker-free at 100% brightness, but once it’s dimmed, we do get some flicker at around 1000 Hz.

The 10-50% range technically falls into the “High Risk” category of the IEEE’s 1789 flicker standard.

Log-log chart titled IEEE 1789 Frequency/modulation plot with orange and green regions marked Low Effect Limit and No Effect Limit. An X mark appears in the upper right green section. Axes: Frequency (Hz), Modulation (% Flicker).

Dropping it to just 75%, limits the depth so it stays within the low risk range:

Logarithmic graph titled “IEEE 1789 Frequency/modulation plot” showing modulation versus frequency. The range is divided into “Low Effect Limit” (yellow) and “No Effect Limit” (green); a black cross is marked in the green area.

So I’d keep this at 100% if you like to avoid flicker.

Overall Thoughts

I’m quite pleased with the performance and specs of this SAD lamp. It’s expensive, but the construction and output are unmatched. The SunLike visible light output, as well as the plethora of healthy infrared light, makes this a combo SAD lamp unlike any other on the market.

The fact that this can double as an infrared light therapy panel is just icing on the cake!

This does have some flicker when dimmed, and its low surface area to lux gives it a very high glare rating, meaning it’s not very visually comfortable to use at 100% brightness. So, this might not be a wise choice if you are sensitive to bright light or glare.

Overall, if you’re looking for a highly effective lamp with full-spectrum “sunlike” light and infrared, there’s no other choice.

BlockBlueLight Full Spectrum + Infrared SAD Lamp

A rectangular white LED light therapy panel with five rows of circular LED bulbs, a digital display screen showing 0932, and control buttons. A power cord is plugged into the side of the device.

Pros:

  • Extremely bright and effective
  • One of the few SAD lamps using full spectrum SunLike diodes
  • Very full in healthy red and infrared coverage

Cons:

  • Expensive, but not terribly so for the performance
  • High glare rating, not very comfortable to use visually for a long time

🏷️ 10% off through link ⤵

  • Three LED light therapy devices are displayed on a wooden table, with white and pink text reading SOLshine Scientifically Tested above them. A plant is visible in the background.

    SOLshine Review: Lab-Tested “Photo-Nutrition” Light

    We tested the SOLshine PhotoVites & bioBulb. See our spectral graphs, infrared output, and why this full-spectrum lamp outperforms standard SAD lights.

    Read More
  • A man wears glasses with one red lens and one clear lens. The background is split: a sunset with “Blue Blockers” on the left and a sunny sky with “Light Therapy” on the right. A question mark is above his head.

    Propeaq Review: Better Than AYO or Luminette?

    Are Propeaq glasses worth the hype? We compared them to AYO and Luminette. See why these “2-in-1” glasses fail to deliver effective light therapy.

    Read More
  • Illustration of a cozy attic bedroom with string lights, a bed, nightstand, and shelves. Large window shows a starry night sky. Text reads, Best Lights for Sleeping.

    Best Color Light for Sleep: We Tested Down the Top Options

    Don’t waste money on fake sleep lights. We narrowed down the market to the best red and amber bulbs. Discover the specific 1600K-1000K lights that work.

    Read More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cindy Lowe

Hi Derek. I have been looking at the Mitolux Sunlamp to purchase but the price is so expensive. Today I found this Full Spectrum + Infrared lamp and it is priced quite a bit better than the Mitolux. I have used SAD light for years now in the winter so this is certainly capable of providing the circadian lux that I need. Also, as well as I can determine it provides both red and infrared light. The only difference is that it does not provide UVB to enhance vitamin D. But that was not my priority in using the lamp. I want a lamp that my husband can also use to enhance testosterone production. Is the UVB the big difference in these two? If vitamin D production is not my main goal can I get about the same benefits from the Full Spectrum + lamp as the Mitolux for a much better price?
Thanks so much for your input!

Cindy Lowe

Thanks Derek!

Dan

I noticed the SOLshine has overtaken the BBL lamp in the SAD Lamp database rankings, but the BBL still remains your top choice for ‘best full spectrum’. I couldn’t see anything in the reviews to explain the preference so I wondered if you could expand on that.

Also, would it fair to say the SOLshine also outperforms BBL as a red light therapy panel too? I don’t know much about the benefits the different nm offer.

Thanks!

Yifei

Now PhotoVites by SOLshine is in stock. Would you say if there is any reason to choose BBL’s product over SOLshine’s PhotoVites? I emailed BBL and they say “LUX Rating: 3000 – 14,000 lux @ 3 inches: As this is the minimum distance advised, we only provide this measurement at the advised distance and not at any other distances.” which seems pretty weak (although your review says BBL’s product has 10,000+ lux at 1 foot, which is better than what they claim). Also BBL says “This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or health condition.” while PhotoVites claim “SAD Rated — 13,470 LUX @ 2 feet” and Alaska Northern Lights says their products are “proven, natural remedy for fighting Winter Blues” … “Doctor recommended” … “combat the symptoms of seasonal affective disorder, winter blues, sleep disorders and other mood disorders”.

Yifei

Under “Specs” in BlockBlueLight’s “Full Spectrum + Infrared” product page, it actually says “LUX Rating: 3000 – 14,000 lux @ 3” “, which you can go and check. And as I raised this in my email, they told me what I said above as they confirmed the “3-inch” indication.

Lindsay

Hello, I have this light and love it. Sadly I lost the lead and need a new one. I have an adjustable Power Supply, 9V-36V 3A 108W DC. It says input voltage:24v DC on the back but my dad says I need to know the polarity. Can you help?

Kim

Hey there! Awesome review! Are you able to use just the sad lights or just the red infrared lights individually?

Nick

Do the infrared LEDs flicker when the brightness is reduced, or do only the full spectrum LEDs flicker?